首页> 外文OA文献 >Legislative drafting guidelines: How different are they from controlled language rules for technical writing?
【2h】

Legislative drafting guidelines: How different are they from controlled language rules for technical writing?

机译:立法起草指南:它们与技术写作的受控语言规则有何不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While human-oriented controlled languages developed and applied in the domain of technical documentation have received considerable attention, language control exerted in the process of legislative drafting has, until recently, gone relatively unnoticed by the controlled language community. This paper considers existing legislative drafting guidelines from the perspective of controlled language. It presents the results of a qualitative comparison of the rule sets of four German-language legislative drafting guidelines from Austria, Germany and Switzerland with a representative collection of controlled language rules published by the German Professional Association for Technical Communication. The analysis determines the extent to which the respective rule sets control the same or similar aspects of language use and identifies the main differences between legislative drafting guidelines and controlled language rules for technical writing.
机译:尽管在技术文档领域开发和应用的以人为本的受控语言已受到相当大的关注,但直到最近,受控语言界对立法起草过程中施加的语言控制仍未引起注意。本文从受控语言的角度考虑了现有的立法起草指南。它呈现了定性比较奥地利,德国和瑞士的四种德语立法起草指南的规则集与德国专业技术交流协会出版的代表性受控语言规则的定性比较结果。分析确定了相应规则集在多大程度上控制语言使用的相同或相似方面,并确定了法律起草指南与技术写作受控语言规则之间的主要区别。

著录项

  • 作者

    Höfler, Stefan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号